Apple is not so Different anymore

I’ve been a big fan of the mac for a few years now.  I’ve never been an Apple fanboy, and I am the first to admit that I have my fair share of problems with my macs over the years.  But recently Apple have begun to grate my ethical nerves for a couple of reasons.

Blogging and Social Media

Apple have been developing applications that allow people to blog and podcast with their mac right out of the box.  (Granted the apps aren’t all that great, but whatever.)  Apple customers, and this is a great big generalization here, have been at the forefront of social media.  It’s easier to do audio and video work on a mac, and corporate culture of “Think Different” lends its self to these digital hippies that are creating content for free. 

However, Apple have not adopted these technologies into their own corporate culture which makes a lot of people think that Apple are being very hypocritical.  Bloggers have been bashing Apple’s PR practices for months now and there has been no response at all.  Command and control messaging that has been used by companies to build their brand is no longer effective.  Consumers are skeptical when they hear the lattest tagline, and it is getting harder and harder to buy into corporate messages.  Social media advocates will tell you that the only way to get out of this type of messaging is to engage with your customers.  Listen to them, talk to them. 

Apple was perfectly positioned to do that.  Mac fans are just that: fanatics.  There would be so much good feed back coming from their customers.  But sadly Apple have decided to close the door and continue to bombard us with lifestyle ads.

One last rant on the Apple’s relationship with its customers.  As I mentioned earlier, mac people are fanatics and are constantly waiting for the next product release.  There are several websites that write about rumoured products and services that will be appearing from Apple in the near future. A little while ago, Apple tried to force one of these sites to reveal the source of a leak that revealed a new product.  Apple argued that the blogger is not a journalist and thus was not covered by the first amendment.  Apple recently lost the case, thus granting bloggers the same rights as journalists.  (At least in California anyway.) 

There is a huge irony in the fact that Apple was the company to get everyone all excited about creating new media, these same bloggers are somehow less credible than other journalists, and finally reinforced blogger’s rights by losing a court battle.  Damn, there’s some weird Karma going on there.

Production Practices:

The other thing that bugs me about Apple is that they have positioned themselves to be the ethical company that enables people to change the world.  (Search google video> “Apple ads” to see what I mean.)  They invoke Ghandi and other labour leaders to make their point in their advertising.  How dare they?

Wired ran an article yesterday on how Apple products are manufactured in China.  Apple assembles all of their products in China and their labour practices, although not terrible, have been called into question.  As the article points out, politically propressive Apple should be way above the minimun labour standards.  This is yet another missed opportunity by the Apple PR department.

Another thing about the Apple’s production that bothers me is the quality.  Just a few years ago the aluminum powerbook was a the epitome of production quality.  Recently bloggers and websites have been reporting more and more defects and shody quality standards on their flagship products.  Several class-action suits have been launched against the company and again their has been no public response from the company.

Conclusions:

Will I stop buy macs?  We’ll see.  Although i like to be an ethical consumer, almost every hi-tech product in NA has passed through an asian factory with relatively low paid workers.  As for the PR gaffs and non-communicative nature of the company, we can only hope that Apple will eventually drink the kool-aid and start talking to it’s customers.  We’ll see what happens when people start to get really pissed off.  They are already making comparisons to the “old” evil-empire Mirosoft.

I’ll leave you with some questions:  How important are these things to you?  Is the contradictory corporate culture a deterent to you as a consumer?  Do you care if your products are produced in sweat shops by a company that markets to the politically progessive?

Published in:  on June 14, 2006 at 11:06 am Comments (3)

CC Chapman on Second Life

I just got through listening to CC Chapman's latest installment of Managing the Gray, where CC gives a great primer on SL.  It's a fantastic summary of what SL is and isn't.

If you've heard the buzz about SL but still don't have any idea what it's all about, check out this podcast.   When people ask me about SL, I'm sending them a link to this podcast.

Also, if you're into social media check out the rest of his podcasts, he's a succesful guy who has a lot to say. 

I'm listening and learning.

Published in:  on June 12, 2006 at 9:10 am Leave a Comment

Free Culture

I came across FreeCulture.org today and wanted to write a few thoughts about "the Movement".  Check out their manifesto here

From a philosophical stand point I agree whole heartedly.  Record companies and movie studios should not limit the chances for aspiring artists to publish.  Hardware should not enable companies to charge us over and over again to use data that we own.  Copyright must be changed soon.

However, we are in the midst of a big shift in the way we do things on the net at the moment.  Social media are changing the way that we produce and distribute content, and the law, business models and mainstream beliefs are catching up to this shift.  People on the left love to talk about the "democratization" that is being caused by the net, and again I totally agree and share their enthusiasm.

But we live in a huge system.  An economic system, a political system, a natural system.  Big shifts in perspective take time to cultivate and new law and business models need to be discussed and developed to make the big shift that the Free Culture manifesto calls for.  Some businesses are getting it, some laws are changing to reflect the new technological democracy.  Other companies are introducing draconian measures to curtail the "user" and some government are creating law that will set us back years.

To change hearts and minds of the people on the other side though, is a really different matter.  If you worked for a company in a very mature market and that has established suppliers, effective and profitable distribution channels and strong relationships with industry partners, would you be all psyched to go out and change all that based on the fad of the day?  I'm playing devils advocate here, but these companies have a great deal at stake.

I have faith that the market will sort this out.  One or two of the big companies will get it, and will make a pile of money getting it.  Once there are a few good examples of ethical business models that will make money, other markets will follow. 

What really scares me is the law makers; these people that we entrust to turn our values and beliefs into laws and legislation that actually reflect the will of the people.  These people deal in stakeholders.  They listen to the most vocal lobbyists/ activists/ interested group and make decisions for the greater good.  The problem is that "the greater good" today, will not reflect the greater good tomorrow.  As our boomer predecessors move into retirement homes, things will change.  Attitudes will change.  And we will have to change the law, again.

I am so thoroughly convinced that as gen x/y/z come of age, the real information democracy will be called for, demanded even.  You can hear it already. 

In the end I want my kids to live a world that values content more than money.  I want them to be able to participate and create stuff without breaking any laws.  I'm scared and excited at the same time. 

Published in:  on April 4, 2006 at 12:03 pm Leave a Comment